Posts Tagged settlement

Ohio BWC – Changing the Settlement Process

VN:F [1.7.8_1020]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)
VN:F [1.7.8_1020]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Information received indicates that, effective 1-1-2010, the Ohio BWC will impose NEW rules regarding BWC settlement offers: Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation – making a bad situation worse !

VN:F [1.7.8_1020]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
VN:F [1.7.8_1020]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)

deny injured worker benefitsThe current atmosphere at the OhioBWC is anti-injured worker. The MCO’s continue to deny requested medical treatment, the BWC is actively making settlements of claims more onerous.

It’s bad enough to get hurt on the job, but fighting the system that is supposed to protect injured workers is downright demoralizing.

The BWC is now forcing settlement allocations between compensation, future medical expense, and protection of Medicare interests. That would not be bad but when the BWC forces allocation in a settlement for an injured worker who will not be eligible for Medicare benefits until age 65 or 66, it becomes absurd.

As a result of an internal audit performed late in 2008, the BWC decided that, in order to clean house, it would reduce settlement offers to injured workers, utilize co-morbidity tables (taking a persons whole medical history into account in the settlement of a broken leg, for example), and use the current economic situation to ’squeeze’ low settlement amounts for workers’ in economic distress (terminated due to economy, etc.)

So much for a system that makes a ‘Plegde’ of Service to injured workers.

Now, the Ohio Senate is considering bringing privatization to workers’ compensation in Ohio. Anyone who is injured in the service of a self-insured employer knows the extra nightmare of claim battles. Bringing privatization into the BWC arena will increase the battle between the injured worker and the benefits to which he/she is entitled.

Contact Governor Strickland and tell him that you want a change for the benefit of the injured worker.

Contact your state representative and tell him/her that you want a change for the benefit of the injured worker.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Can This Be Happening in Ohio? – OUTRAGEOUS Settlement Requirement

VN:F [1.7.8_1020]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
VN:F [1.7.8_1020]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

“should any part of . . . my settlement or this agreement be challenged and found to be unconstitutional, unlawful, or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the settlement and this acknowledgement and waiver shall remain in full force and effect.”

My fingers are buring  as I type this entry. I am outraged by the current actions of the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation – not only in the recent low-balling of lump sum settlement top offers, but , insult on injury, requiring Ohio Injured Workers to sign the attached document.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,